OpenStack: An example of why we are so passionate about early stage technology

November 12th, 2012 by ryan

I recently had the opportunity to speak at the OpenStack Summit in San Diego. It was a great conference and all the content is online for all to enjoy which is truly an opensource gift for those who couldn’t make it in person.

While its still early for OpenStack, I know its going to be a major disruptive force. OpenStack gives the opportunity for enterprise companies (or service providers) to offer similar basic capabilities as service offerings such as AWS to internal groups (or external customers) on their own private cloud. I am excited about the possibilities and so much so that I put together an entire presentation around the opportunity for startups and venture investors. My presentation with video captures most of our current thinking.

If you prefer just the slide deck

The high level summary is that OpenStack has started what will be a complete rebuild of the enterprise data center. It will take time and it won’t be a straight path but this shift represents one of the most fundamental changes to enterprise infrastructure in my 12 years as an IT investor. Many existing companies will adapt and thrive – many more will fail – but the massive disruption in the enterprise IT market will create enormous opportunities for startups in the years ahead.

Let me know what you think.

Reflections on going Public on the Taiwan Stock Exchange

September 24th, 2012 by Sanjay

In Jan 2005, Storm Ventures invested in IML a fabless semiconductor company based in Campbell California. In 2008 the company had $47 million in revenue and was profitable and the board began evaluating options for an IPO (Initial Public offering). The board concluded that a NASDAQ offering was not feasible for a variety of reasons:

1/ IML’s revenues were below $100 million

2/ IML had a high customer concentration with Samsung accounting for a majority of the company’s revenue.

At the same time the Taiwan Stock Exchange (TWSE) was out in Silicon Valley marketing its stock exchange as a venue to access capital as well as to provide liquidity for investors. The TWSE was going to for the first time; allow non -Taiwanese companies to register and sell stock on the TWSE.  IML began evaluating this alternative and in early 2009 decided to file for an IPO on the TWSE .
The process took almost a year and IML finally on May 18, 2010 became the first non-Taiwanese company to trade on the TWSE.  The stock was priced at NT$ 143 (US$1.00= NT$30 )and went up to NT$ 243 before settling down.
Here are my thoughts:
1/ The IPO process took much longer than I anticipated as both the company and its advisors were learning the rules in Taiwan as well as the Taiwanese regulators were trying to determine which rules should apply to non-Taiwanese companies and which ones did not apply to companies incorporated out of Taiwan.
2/ The cost to go public was an order of magnitude lower…closer to $ 300k rather than $3 million. This included , legal, accounting and D&O insurance.
3/ IML did raise $40 million less an underwriter fee which again was much lower than the standard 7% a US banker would have charged.
4/ The PE multiple was similar to a semiconductor company on the NASDAQ.
5/ Taiwan will follow International Financial Regulations (IFRS) which means that from an accounting perspective IML’s financial disclosures are very similar to what they would be on the NYSE or NASDAQ
6/ The lock up for insider was similar to what one would see here on the NASDAQ…for the first 180 days all of Storms shares were locked up and then 50% was released. After one year 100% was free of lock up. But we were still subject to blackouts and other restrictions on trading similar to the US
7/ The stock was bought by mostly individual investor (more than 70%) with very little institutional buying. Even now, more than two and a half years as a publicly traded company IML’s institutional ownership is below 20%. This was a bit of a disappointment for me as I had thought that there will be larger percentage of institutional ownership. One of the down sides of individual investors is that they look for dividend income.
8/ Liquidity has been an issue for Storm as we cannot distribute IML shares to our LP’s easily as each of our LP’s would need to open an account in Taiwan which places an unnecessary burden on our LP’s.

Overall I would say that the NASDAQ and NYSE still provide broader and deeper pools of capital and liquidity, and remain the gold standard for accessing public markets; but there are alternatives for those issuers willing to look elsewhere. Unless US legislators and regulators understand the global nature of markets and the need to be competitive globally, we in the US will lose the lead we have in financial capital markets.

Flint Mobile: Investing in the perfect storm

June 28th, 2012 by Alex

Storm has been a long time investor in the mobile space dating back to when we founded the firm in 2000. The most notable early investment was Airespace, which was started by Storm in 2001 and acquired in 2005 by Cisco for $450 million.  We have also made some investments that have been more challenging pre iPhone and it feels like we have been through another industrial revolution, before and after the advent of the iPhone in 2007, and the AppStore in 2008 (which today boasts over 550,000 apps and more than 25 billion downloads). There are nearly 6 billion mobile cellular subscriptions (5 times that of fixed lines).  There are more iPhones sold per day (402K) than people born in the World per day (300K). We identified the mobile opportunity early on early on and have continued to invest in and surf this powerful wave.

As a result of the mobile tsunami described above, the mobile payments space has heated and finally had a breakout in 2011. The large notable online incumbents Google, PayPal and Intuit are all battling for control of the mobile wallet, and how payments are made at POS (point-of-sale), stirring folks like Amex, MasterCard and Visa to protect their turf.  According to GigaOm, there were 81.3 million people worldwide using their mobile device to make payments (including in-app payments, mobile ticketing and mobile coupons) in 2009. By the end of 2014, this is forecasted to rise to nearly 490 million (a six fold increase but still only 8 percent of mobile subscribers). While it’s still early, mobile payments are going to be the next big thing as the world moves to mobile computing devices as primary platforms. The most notable company to capitalize on this trend has been Square – until Flint Mobile :) .

Social media and networking has had its own meteoric rise in the last 5 years. The statistics are pretty interesting (I think) and Social Skinny has a good summary.  Today there are more than 845 million active Facebook users, and 2.8 billion social media profiles. On average in one year, we will share 415 pieces of content on Facebook, we’ll spend an average of about 23 minutes a day on Twitter, tweeting a total of around 15,795 tweets, we’ll check in 563 times on Foursquare, upload 196 hours of video on YouTube, and send countless emails.  The impact on business is pretty clear: 38% of CEOs label social media a high priority and 57% of businesses plan to hike their social media spend in 2012; one in three small businesses are now using social media.

These three big trends set the stage for Flint Mobile, which sits at the intersection of mobile, payments, and social media. Flint Mobile’s value proposition is based on elegant simplicity: Allow mobile micro and small merchants to accept payments on any mobile device from their customers while building a valued relationship with them. No friction on boarding a merchant, no friction in accepting a payment, no friction in customer relationship management. And with a fee structure that is competitive with market pricing.

How does it work? Flint has developed an app along with core scanning technology that allows any mobile device to detect and read the digits of any plastic card (debit or credit). This information is encrypted and along with expiration and card verification code allows a secure payment transaction to take place. No dongles or triangles or other devices are required, just your phone. The customer receives an email verification and receipt with an opportunity to provide feedback or share the product or service experience. The merchant is able to track customer transactions, satisfaction and sentiment via a Flint Mobile hosted website tailored to the merchants business. This becomes a powerful tool for on going customer development, marketing and financial management.

Flint Mobile is an example of a company that has been able to create a unique value proposition as a result of advances in technology and broad mobile adoption and application use. None of this would have been possible five years ago.

We are excited about the opportunity that Flint Mobile has of bringing this value proposition to an audience of more than twenty million mobile micro and small merchants in the US alone. We will be working with our friends at True Ventures to make it a success. Welcome to the Storm family!

A Perspective on Venture Capital

February 13th, 2012 by ryan

A post by my partner Sanjay that was originally submitted to Siliconindia. You can find it here.

To understand Venture Capital today, we need to first look back at the past performance of this investment class. Historically Venture Capital returns have been on average 800 basis points better than the stock market. In other words when the NASDAQ, DJIA or S&P 500 were delivering 12 percent to 15 percent returns then the Venture Capital industry in aggregate was delivering 20 percent to 30 percent. Now those were average returns for the whole asset class with some funds delivering returns as high as 80 percent IRR’s and correspondingly there others with returns that were lower than the average or even negative. On the whole, however, returns in Venture Capital were better than what you would have received by investing in bonds or stocks and the venture capital industry therefore attracted more capital and more managers.
Read more

Qumu’s next phase as part of Rimage

November 8th, 2011 by ryan

Storm is excited for the Qumu team’s recent combination with Rimage (Nasdaq: RIMG).  Rimage viewed this acquisition as transformational ,and clearly validates the vision Qumu (fka Media Publisher) had over 5 years ago about the importance of on demand and real-time video in the enterprise. Video assets have become increasingly important in the workplace, and the ability to deliver the right content to the right audience at the right time has become a strategic differentiator to several Fortune 100 companies. The market has shifted in Qumu’s direction, and we think this combination will help accelerate the rapid growth they have experienced over the last couple of years. Although the early vision was correct, the timing for the market to acknowledge this took longer and the Qumu team did a great job driving a “nice to have” to a “need to have” solution for several key customers.
Read more

Congratulations to the team at Sandforce!

October 26th, 2011 by ryan

This afternoon LSI Corporation announced that it is acquiring SandForce for $400 million in cash and assumed options.

We are excited for the team at SandForce and proud to have been a part of building a company that is helping to usher in a new era of storage. SandForce delivers solid state disk (SSD) processors that power volume flash memory in both high-end storage as well as consumer applications. The primary advantages of flash memory are that it is much faster, more reliable and consumes less energy than hard disk drives. Many of our limited partners and investors that have looked at investing at SandForce over the years will likely remember us saying that flash memory is the most disruptive force in storage since the floppy disk drive. We truly believed that when we made the decision to invest in 2006 as we saw the use of flash becoming more ubiquitous in devices like the iPod. We believed that as more consumer devices took advantage of flash, the price of flash would decrease and its uses in enterprise applications would increase. As the price of flash per GB came closer to hard disk drives, more applications would take advantage of all it had to offer including dramatically faster performance.
Read more

Adobe Acquires Echosign

July 25th, 2011 by ryan

Congratulations to the EchoSign team starting with Jason Lemkin, the founder and CEO!  Here is a link to the EchoSign blog that has more of the specific details regarding the transaction. Jason started EchoSign as a Storm EIR with a vision to transform how all contracts get signed using SaaS.  Five years later after Storm provided the initial funding, Echosign has grown to almost 1m contracts a month. Great job team Echosign.
Read more

Passion: What we value most part 2

May 6th, 2011 by ryan

While I may sound obvious, passion for markets and technologies and ultimately for building a business is incredibly important to us as investors. Passion has a clear emotional connotation and I choose that word deliberately. Building a business is an emotional endeavor. It takes blood, sweat and tears and it seems just about impossible to me that one would be able to come out the other side without having had the experience been an emotional one in addition to all the other things like selling to customers, hiring a great team, raising money from venture investors and hopefully building a tremendous amount of value for all stakeholders.  Passion can also have a strong mix of (blind) faith and determination.
Read more

Qualities We Value Most in Entrepreneurs and Founders: Transparency

April 5th, 2011 by ryan
We meet at lot of entrepreneurs and teams at Storm. While I think my partners may value some qualities differently, I think we would all agree on a core set of qualities in entrepreneurs we invest in that we believe contribute to success. These qualities are all important and where we have made some exceptions, I think in general we have been disappointed. I will cover each one in some depth in separate posts and welcome comments.

Read more

Mobile Store Economics Rant – App Developers Need to Fight Back

February 15th, 2011 by ryan

I have been thinking about a quick post on App Store economics for a while. For some time, I have thought that the 30% rake that all the app stores take today  - imho – just isn’t sustainable.  So long as their is choice in the market, economics should bias towards the app developers.  Mobile competition is intense and should produce good consumer choice.
Read more